新东方在线托福整理了托福改革的相关内容，包括改革后的考试时间、评分标准、改革对比等内容，今天带来的是托福改革后：阅读|听力|口语|写作算分标准，希望对大家的托福考试有所帮助！

从2023年7月26日开始的所有考试将采用新的考试内容。

阅读考试由3篇减至2篇文章(共20题题目), 并取消加试；

同时因为算分题量的减少，每道题目的平均分值占比会更高，所以容错率会变低，对于做题总是粗心马虎的同学会更不友好。但不同难度题目分值是否不同，目前还没有相应消息，具体的算分方式还要等ETS官方公布。

听力部分不变，但加试取消；

口语部分不变，仍是1道独立+3道综合

Delivery

第一点是表达，这一点需要发音清晰流畅，标准，单词发音要清楚，不能含糊不清，同时音量也需要注意，作答要让考官听的清楚。此外，需要停顿自然，语调自然，在作答过程中如果时快时慢，过着语速过快，考官听起来也会很费力。

Language use

第二点是语言的使用，即词汇和语法的运用。词汇部分建议掌握常用词汇例如至少准备高中阶段和四级词汇部分，同时也要掌握各自的搭配，避免在使用此会中出现不恰当的情况;此外语法部分需要掌握最基本的句型，时态部分也尽量少出现错误，例如在描述过去的事件时使用了一般现在时态是不太合适的。

Topic development

最后是话题展开，这一点要求逻辑关系清晰，内容完整连贯，这一点要注意在平常练习中，注意按照西方人的思维逻辑，紧密有条理的作答题目。例如在作答独立口语部分时要直击主题，按照一定的逻辑进行展开论证与举例描述;在综合口语部分中，要围绕主题，回答扣题。了解了三个维度之后，就可以对自己在准备托福口语中有一定的方向要求，但是还需要对评分细则做一定的掌握，这样可以根据自身的情况做到有一定的目标范围。

自从2019年8月1日考试托福考试改革后，口语评分细则由曾经的4个层次变为5个层次：

Advanced(25-30);High-intermediate(20-24);Low-intermediate(16-19);

Basic score range(10-15);Below Basic(0-9)

具体如下：

1. Advanced(25-30)

对于该部分，托福要求学员能够针对不同的话题比较高效流利地交流作答。

在表达部分，语速基本通常流利，发音清晰，略有停顿，读音语调略有瑕疵，不影响整体效果;

在语言使用部分，考生可以自如的运用语法和词汇，对英语的驾驭能力较强，略有瑕疵，不影响理解;

在话题展开部分，考生能充分的展开论证，整体感强，逻辑清晰紧密;

2. High-intermediate(20-24)

对于该部分，托福要求对于大部分常见熟悉的话题，能够清晰流畅的作答，并且在表达复杂或者学术性话题时能被听懂。

在表达部分，发音基本清楚，语速基本流利。有些读音和重音不准，听着偶尔需要稍加注意才能理解，大意并不受影响;

在语言使用部分，能够使用复杂句式;

在话题展开部分，回答基本是完整的，思路还算清晰，只是展开得不够深入，例子也不是很具体。论点直接的关系不是十分的明确;

3. Low-intermediate(16-19)

对于该部分，托福要求学员描述的信息被基本能听懂。

在表达部分，语速不流利，有明显的停顿，某些地方的意思没办法被人理解;

在词汇部分，词汇有限，表述不清楚;

在逻辑部分，能够表达主要信息时候，但整体信息或者细节表述不清楚;

4. Basic(0-9)

在表达部分，频繁停顿，发音可能受母语影响有明显的问题;

在词汇部分，停顿较多，语法以及词汇量有限;

在逻辑部分，观点不明确，缺乏主旨句或者表述不清楚;

写作考试取消独立写作，但综合作文题将保留，增加一篇1学术讨论写作(题型源自TOEFL Essentials考试)；

5分：

A response at this levelsuccessfully selects the important information from the lecture and coherently and accurately presents this information in relation to the relevant information presented in the reading. The response is well organized, and occasional language errors that are present do not result in inaccurate or imprecise presentation of content or connections.

4分：

A response at this level is generally good in selecting the important information from the lecture and in coherently and accurately presenting this information in relation to the relevant information in the reading, but it may have minor omission, inaccuracy, vagueness, or imprecision of some content from the lecture or in connection to points made in the reading. A response is also scored at this level if it has more frequent or noticeable minor language errors, as long as such usage and grammatical structures do not result in anything more than an occasional lapse of clarity or in the connection of ideas.

3分：

A response at this level contains some important information from the lecture and conveys some relevant connection to the reading, but it is marked by one or more of the following:

• Although the overall response is definitely oriented to the task, it conveys only vague, global, unclear, or somewhat imprecise connection of the points made in the lecture to points made in the reading.

• The response may omit one major key point made in the lecture.

• Some key points made in the lecture or the reading, or connections between the two, may be incomplete, inaccurate, or imprecise.

• Errors of usage and/or grammar may be more frequent or may result in noticeably vague expressions or obscured meanings in conveying ideas and connections.

2分：

A response at this level contains some relevant information from the lecture, but is marked by significant language difficulties or by significant omission or inaccuracy of important ideas from the lecture or in the connections between the lecture and the reading; a response at this level is marked by one or more of the following:

• The response significantly misrepresents or completely omits the overall connection between the lecture and the reading.

• The response significantly omits or significantly misrepresents important points made in the lecture.

• The response contains language errors or expressions that largely obscure connections or meaning at key junctures or that would likely obscure understanding of key ideas for a reader not already familiar with the reading and the lecture.

1分：

A response at this level is marked by one or more of the following:

• The response provides little or no meaningful or relevant coherent content from the lecture.

• The language level of the response is so low that it is difficult to derive meaning.

0分：

A response at this level merely copies sentences from the reading, rejects the topic or is otherwise not connected to the topic, is written in a foreign language, consists of keystroke characters, or is blank.

5分：

A fully successful response The response is a relevant and very clearly expressed contribution to the online discussion, and it demonstrates consistent facility in the use of language. A typical response displays the following:

• Relevant and well-elaborated explanations, exemplifications, and/or details

• Effective use of a variety of syntactic structures and precise, idiomatic word choice

• Almost no lexical or grammatical errors other than those expected from a competent writer writing under timed conditions (e.g., common typos or common misspellings or substitutions like there/their)

4分：

A generally successful response The response is a relevant contribution to the online discussion, and facility in the use of language allows the writer’s ideas to be easily understood. A typical response displays the following:

• Relevant and adequately elaborated explanations, exemplifications, and/or details

• A variety of syntactic structures and appropriate word choice

• Few lexical or grammatical errors

3分：

A partially successful response The response is a mostly relevant and mostly understandable contribution to the online discussion, and there is some facility in the use of language. A typical response displays the following:

• Elaboration in which part of an explanation, example, or detail may be missing, unclear, or irrelevant

• Some variety in syntactic structures and a range of vocabulary

• Some noticeable lexical and grammatical errors in sentence structure, word form, or use of idiomatic language

2分：

A mostly unsuccessful response The response reflects an attempt to contribute to the online discussion, but limitations in the use of language may make ideas hard to follow. A typical response displays the following:

• Ideas that may be poorly elaborated or only partially relevant

• A limited range of syntactic structures and vocabulary

• An accumulation of errors in sentence structure, word forms, or use

1分：

An unsuccessful response The response reflects an ineffective attempt to contribute to the online discussion, and limitations in the use of language may prevent the expression of ideas. A typical response may display the following:

• Words and phrases that indicate an attempt to address the task but with few or no coherent ideas

• Severely limited range of syntactic structures and vocabulary

• Serious and frequent errors in the use of language

• Minimal original language; any coherent language is mostly borrowed from the stimulus

0分：

The response is blank, rejects the topic, is not in English, is entirely copied from the prompt, is entirely unconnected to the prompt, or consists of arbitrary keystrokes.